Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | slaxx | 5-0 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | aleister95 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Unknown Archetype | don_goto1990 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | scooby_snacks | 5-0 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | roter_erzengel | 6-1 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Dimir Control , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Proliferate , Golgari Analyst , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Deathtouch , Golgari Demons , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Lifedrain Combo
Meta Performance Analysis
Choking Miasma ranks #217 out of approximately 344 cards in raw efficiency (top 63%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Black average: 59.5%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Choking Miasma is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 12.28 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Choking Miasma has a win rate of 70.0%, making it 1.4% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Choking Miasma than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 5 | 80.8% | 70.2% | +10.6% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 5 | 75.0% | 70.1% | +4.9% |
| Thrun, Breaker of Silence | Legendary Creature — Troll Shaman | 5 | 5 | 68.8% | 64.5% | +4.3% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 8 | 75.0% | 71.3% | +3.7% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 13 | 72.1% | 68.4% | +3.7% |
| Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 18 | 70.9% | 67.4% | +3.5% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 19 | 72.2% | 69.7% | +2.5% |
| Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 10 | 71.7% | 69.2% | +2.5% |
| Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 18 | 71.3% | 69.0% | +2.3% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 9 | 71.7% | 69.5% | +2.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 359 | 46.4% | 45.0% |
| Golgari Demons | 345 | 63.3% | 46.3% |
| Golgari Obliterator | 9 | 75.0% | 55.2% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 7 | 24.1% | 52.7% |
| Golgari Reanimator | 3 | 25.0% | 11.1% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.